South East, Insecurity and Governance by
Emmanuel Onwubiko
By Daily Post Staff
21st February 2021
“The policy of overt and
covert exclusion and
discrimination beginning with
Awolowo’s banking
regulations at the end of the
Civil War and pursued
relentlessly by the
Muhammed/ Obasanjo
administration has had its
day and must now end in the
interest of stability and
progress.”
“In a famous motion which was disallowed for mysterious reasons by the President of the
Nigerian Senate and subsequently published by its author after resigning his Senate seat, Mr.
F.J. Ellah has drawn attention to what can only be called the Muhammed- Obasanjo conspiracy
by which four states and a considerable interest in a fifth were given to the Yoruba while their
Igbo competitors of about equal population got two. This was done in preparation for a new
fiscal arrangement in which states would determine what share of Federal allocations went to
whom. The gross inequity here must be apparent to anyone who is not blinded by prejudice or
self-interest.”
“Arguments about siting major Federal industries, huge irrigation schemes and agricultural
projects of revolutionary dimensions may seem tiresome to Federal Ministers visiting Anambra
and Imo States and having to explain away so any one with the slightest interest in fairness can
begin to excuse the transparent discrimination of past and present Federal governments in this
regard.”
“Many have tried but nobody has quite succeeded in explaining away the siting of five steel mills
worth N4.5 billion on final completion, with estimated employment capacity of 100,000 by 1990,
only in the North and West of the country. The hypocrisy and guilt attendant upon such a
gigantic abuse of elementary fair-play was “beautifully” demonstrated in a November 9, 1982
National Concord report: ‘No question was considered too preposterous for the Minister. He was
called upon to explain why the spread of mills left out the eastern south of Nigeria.”
“Malam Ali Makele said it was not fair to reach such a dangerous conclusion. He said there was a
mill affiliated to Aladja meant to sell steel products to Bendel, Cross River, Rivers, Imo and
Anambra States”.(The Trouble With Nigeria by Chinua Achebe).
These ugly situation painted graphically in this book authored by Professor Chinua Achebe in the
1980’S is still as relevant as it was when it was published. The South East of Nigeria till dare has
continued to face marginalization in terms of the distorted and disproportionate allocation of
national assets to the South East of Nigeria by the current administration of President
Muhammadu Buhari.
The state of marginalization and exclusion, alienation of the Igbo speaking people by the central
government especially the Muhammadu Buhari-led administration which has failed to appoint
any South East officer of the military as service chief, has created a general climate of alienation
from happenings within the confines of political system in operation in the South East of Nigeria.
Last month, as head of the HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA), I
coordinated a capacity building programme to bridge the gap between the civilian populace of
South East of Nigeria and the Nigerian Military Institutions.
This dialogue session which happened symbolically in Enugu, the regional Capital of Igbo land,
was inspired by the altruistic decision of the then Chief of Army Staff Lieutenant General Tukur
Yusuf Buratai to mainstream the Institutional dialogues platform between civilians and the
Military stylishly named department for Civil Military relations. To underscore the strategic place
of this department, the then Army Chief appointed a Major General to head the office which has
runs the human rights desk.
During that capacity building workshop which took place few steps away from the magnificent
sports Complex in Enugu known as the Nmamdi Azikwe stadium, I was able to tap some
intelligence from the over 100 Youngsters drawn from some Federal Tertiary Institutions in the
South East of Nigeria. The Central theme of the information gleaned from these students is the
apparent chasms between the government of the South East and the governed. I found out that
there are a lot of credibility issues around the kind of view that most Young people have about
both elected and appointed public office holders in all of the South East.I also found out that the
streets of South East is now populated by less privileged and hungry children.
Sadly, it does not seem that the political leaders of the South East of Nigeria have really fully
grasped the implications of the existence of the gulf between the governors and the governed.
For instance, our finding regarding the large numbers of children on the streets begging rather
than be in schools, made me to call about ten leading senators from the South East of Nigeria.
The vigorous conversations I initiated on what needs to be done at the policy formulation and
implementation level to end child poverty in the South East of Nigeria, rather became a rude
awakening to the absence of trust between politicians of the South East of Nigeria and the
people of the South East of Nigeria.
I then put it to one of the senior ranking Senators of Igbo extraction that it is obligatory that the
political class put out measures and strategies to bridge the gaps between them and those they
governed and also address the absence of sustainable capacity development programmes for
the citizens of the South East of Nigeria.
These Senators have till date, going to a month, refused to even give us a date for us to meet
and brainstorm on some of these measures to bring about good and qualitative governance.
One of the Senators who was a governor for 8 years in Abia State did not even know that street
children are all over the place in Abia state.
The Abia State governor Okezie Ikpeazu, to be fair, has done a positive thing in the area of
Human skill and capacity building and development initiative through the promotion of the made
in Aba brand.
To this extent, we think the Abia State governor’s approach needs to be extended to other
critical areas such as improving the dialogues between the citizens of the South East and their
political office holders.
The place of the governors in effectively jump starting the aggressive personal development of
their people can not be over emphasized and indeed even the United Nations has said so
unambiguously.
The UN chief travelled recently to Abuja, Nigeria, where he met the States Governors, who can
play a “fundamental role” in shaping the future of their country by implementing the sustainable
development agenda Members States will adopt in a month in New York.
“You have the resources and the power to help the people of Nigeria realize the tremendous
promise of this great country – on education, on health care, on women’s empowerment, on
climate change, on governance, institution-building, security and on rights across the board,”
stated Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in his remarks.
Stressing that he was speaking at a time of great challenges – including the rise of extremism
and the lack of equal opportunity –, he acknowledged that the Governors of the Northeast, in
particular Borno State, Mr. Ban assured that this was also a “time of hope,” as the peaceful
democratic transition of power in Nigeria showed.
Reminding Governors that, over the past few weeks, UN Member States agreed on a new
financing for development plan and on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, he
pointed out that the latter would be adopted be formally adopted by world leaders in New York
in September, while governments will meet in Paris in December to agree on a new far-reaching
climate change agreement.
“Together, these three processes provide an opportunity to put the world on a sustainable
pathway fostering human prosperity while protecting our planet,” the Secretary-General
continued.
In that regard, local governments have an important role to play in the implementation of the
Sustainable Development Goals, he added, emphasizing five essential ways for Nigeria to “build
on your advances and sustain that momentum.”
First, the universal framework will have to be tailored to national circumstances to live up to its
promise to be an agenda “of the people, for the people, and by the people” that leaves no one
behind. Sub-national and local governments, he assured, will play a major role in the national
tailoring process and in ensuring that this process is participatory and inclusive.
“Second, we need to work together to establish a revitalized global partnership for development.
Each of you is crucial for engaging local civil society organizations and the private sector in the
implementation of the goals at local level.”
Third, the UN top official explained, sub-national and local governments can help ensure that
the limited available funds are targeted at the most vulnerable and marginalized who are often
hard to reach, in particular ensuring health, education, empowerment and equality for women
and girls.
“That leads to my fourth point – institutionalizing gender mainstreaming across all government
ministries and bodies responsible for implementing agenda 2030, with effective means of
implementation and capacities for monitoring progress.”
Fifth, he noted, Governors can support the follow-up and review process by “feeding inputs”
directly into the review and by helping to ensure the quality of data by investing in institutions
and using big data to inform better planning and decision making.
“Accurate data will also allow us to better respond to new and unforeseen challenges,” Mr. Ban
observed.
“This is a crucial moment for Nigeria. You face many serious challenges, but you have also taken
a hugely important step to move forward in a way that can respond to the aspirations of the
country’s people. I am eager to hear your views on how you think you can best achieve this
universal and ambitious agenda,” he concluded.
I repeat, the political leaders of the rest of the South East of Nigeria needs to make
commitments to begin the transparent and accountable process of dialogues of the governed
and the governors with a view to governing in line with the modalities that would be targeted at
HUMAN capital development just as the Abia state governor has tried to so with his PROUDLY
MADE IN ABA BRAND PROMOTION GLOBALLY. All the South East States must carry along the
leaders of the CIVIL RIGHTS COMMUNITIES IN THE REGION so the interests of the people
including the obligations to protect their lives and properties from violence must be
mainstreamed in the process of governance. Without the promotion and protection of the
welfare and wellbeing of the People of the South East of Nigeria then the essence and primary
duties of civil leaders in all the political offices are defeated. We will very shortly learn from a
new book on HUMAN RIGHTS AND GLOBAL POLITICS in which a chapter dealt with the primacy
of the people in the governance process of the SOVEREIGNTY.
That chapter of the book states as follows:“We may distinguish two main kinds of institution,
representative and functional. On the one hand, there are institutions which represent particular
groups and interests in both practical and ideological senses; on the other, there are those
which have functions in organizing general ideological diffusion, apparently on behalf of society
as a whole. Examples of the former are the traditional representative institutions of civil society,
churches, parties, trade unions, the press and the intelligentsia. Major functional institutions
include schools and universities, television and radio”.
It affirmed further: “Both sets of institutions have had strongly national forms. Indeed, both can
be seen as the ‘organic civil institutions, to use Gramsci’s language, not so much of modern,
capitalist society in general, as he believed, as of the modern nation-state. Representative
institutions have represented society above all in the context of the nation-state- I discussed
above how their most universalistic pretensions conceal adaptations to the nation-state and its
ideology. Functional institutions have educated and informed within and on behalf of nation-
states, performing essential roles in national socialisation and mobilisation, although often
proclaiming universal notions of knowledge and truth”.
Conclusively, these experts asserts: “In both kinds of institution, there have been tensions
between the Universalistic values and norms around which their ideologies revolve, and the
national context in which they have been inserted”. (Human Rights in Global Politics Edited by
Tim Dunne and Nicholas J. Wheeler).”
All said, what is undeniable and consistent is that the society cannot possibly experience peace,
growth in the economic, political, environmental thematic areas, if the wellbeing, welfare and
security of the citizens do not become the NORMATIVE CULTURE OF GOVERNANCE MODELS.
South East of Nigeria is in need of leaders that will think and work to advance the public good
and general interests of the people and not those who seek only their own political means of
wealth acquisition. Those who have ears should hear. The clock is ticking fast and we are sitting
precariously on top of the barrel of the gun and sleeping on top of the gathered gun powder
amidst agitations by the marginalised, the alienated, the abandoned and the wretched of the
South East of Nigeria. THIS IS dangerous as these moral, HUMAN and emotional explosives may
implode with devastating consequences.
*EMMANUEL ONWUBIKO is head of the HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA
(HURIWA) and blogs@www. theingerianinsidernews.com, www.huriwanigeria.com.
South East, Insecurity
and Governance by
Emmanuel Onwubiko
By Daily Post Staff
21st February 2021
“The policy of overt and covert exclusion
and discrimination beginning with
Awolowo’s banking regulations at the end
of the Civil War and pursued relentlessly by
the Muhammed/ Obasanjo administration
has had its day and must now end in the
interest of stability and progress.”
“In a famous motion which was disallowed
for mysterious reasons by the President of
the Nigerian Senate and subsequently
published by its author after resigning his
Senate seat, Mr. F.J. Ellah has drawn
attention to what can only be called the
Muhammed- Obasanjo conspiracy by which
four states and a considerable interest in a
fifth were given to the Yoruba while their
Igbo competitors of about equal population
got two. This was done in preparation for a
new fiscal arrangement in which states
would determine what share of Federal
allocations went to whom. The gross
inequity here must be apparent to anyone
who is not blinded by prejudice or self-
interest.”
“Arguments about siting major Federal
industries, huge irrigation schemes and
agricultural projects of revolutionary
dimensions may seem tiresome to Federal
Ministers visiting Anambra and Imo States
and having to explain away so any one with
the slightest interest in fairness can begin
to excuse the transparent discrimination of
past and present Federal governments in
this regard.”
“Many have tried but nobody has quite
succeeded in explaining away the siting of
five steel mills worth N4.5 billion on final
completion, with estimated employment
capacity of 100,000 by 1990, only in the
North and West of the country. The
hypocrisy and guilt attendant upon such a
gigantic abuse of elementary fair-play was
“beautifully” demonstrated in a November
9, 1982 National Concord report: ‘No
question was considered too preposterous
for the Minister. He was called upon to
explain why the spread of mills left out the
eastern south of Nigeria.”
“Malam Ali Makele said it was not fair to
reach such a dangerous conclusion. He said
there was a mill affiliated to Aladja meant
to sell steel products to Bendel, Cross River,
Rivers, Imo and Anambra States”.(The
Trouble With Nigeria by Chinua Achebe).
These ugly situation painted graphically in
this book authored by Professor Chinua
Achebe in the 1980’S is still as relevant as
it was when it was published. The South
East of Nigeria till dare has continued to
face marginalization in terms of the
distorted and disproportionate allocation of
national assets to the South East of Nigeria
by the current administration of President
Muhammadu Buhari.
The state of marginalization and exclusion,
alienation of the Igbo speaking people by
the central government especially the
Muhammadu Buhari-led administration
which has failed to appoint any South East
officer of the military as service chief, has
created a general climate of alienation from
happenings within the confines of political
system in operation in the South East of
Nigeria.
Last month, as head of the HUMAN RIGHTS
WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA
(HURIWA), I coordinated a capacity
building programme to bridge the gap
between the civilian populace of South East
of Nigeria and the Nigerian Military
Institutions.
This dialogue session which happened
symbolically in Enugu, the regional Capital
of Igbo land, was inspired by the altruistic
decision of the then Chief of Army Staff
Lieutenant General Tukur Yusuf Buratai to
mainstream the Institutional dialogues
platform between civilians and the Military
stylishly named department for Civil
Military relations. To underscore the
strategic place of this department, the then
Army Chief appointed a Major General to
head the office which has runs the human
rights desk.
During that capacity building workshop
which took place few steps away from the
magnificent sports Complex in Enugu
known as the Nmamdi Azikwe stadium, I
was able to tap some intelligence from the
over 100 Youngsters drawn from some
Federal Tertiary Institutions in the South
East of Nigeria. The Central theme of the
information gleaned from these students is
the apparent chasms between the
government of the South East and the
governed. I found out that there are a lot
of credibility issues around the kind of view
that most Young people have about both
elected and appointed public office holders
in all of the South East.I also found out that
the streets of South East is now populated
by less privileged and hungry children.
Sadly, it does not seem that the political
leaders of the South East of Nigeria have
really fully grasped the implications of the
existence of the gulf between the governors
and the governed.
For instance, our finding regarding the
large numbers of children on the streets
begging rather than be in schools, made
me to call about ten leading senators from
the South East of Nigeria.
The vigorous conversations I initiated on
what needs to be done at the policy
formulation and implementation level to
end child poverty in the South East of
Nigeria, rather became a rude awakening to
the absence of trust between politicians of
the South East of Nigeria and the people of
the South East of Nigeria.
I then put it to one of the senior ranking
Senators of Igbo extraction that it is
obligatory that the political class put out
measures and strategies to bridge the gaps
between them and those they governed
and also address the absence of sustainable
capacity development programmes for the
citizens of the South East of Nigeria.
These Senators have till date, going to a
month, refused to even give us a date for
us to meet and brainstorm on some of
these measures to bring about good and
qualitative governance. One of the
Senators who was a governor for 8 years in
Abia State did not even know that street
children are all over the place in Abia state.
The Abia State governor Okezie Ikpeazu, to
be fair, has done a positive thing in the
area of Human skill and capacity building
and development initiative through the
promotion of the made in Aba brand.
To this extent, we think the Abia State
governor’s approach needs to be extended
to other critical areas such as improving the
dialogues between the citizens of the South
East and their political office holders.
The place of the governors in effectively
jump starting the aggressive personal
development of their people can not be
over emphasized and indeed even the
United Nations has said so unambiguously.
The UN chief travelled recently to Abuja,
Nigeria, where he met the States
Governors, who can play a “fundamental
role” in shaping the future of their country
by implementing the sustainable
development agenda Members States will
adopt in a month in New York.
“You have the resources and the power to
help the people of Nigeria realize the
tremendous promise of this great country –
on education, on health care, on women’s
empowerment, on climate change, on
governance, institution-building, security
and on rights across the board,” stated
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in his
remarks.
Stressing that he was speaking at a time of
great challenges – including the rise of
extremism and the lack of equal
opportunity –, he acknowledged that the
Governors of the Northeast, in particular
Borno State, Mr. Ban assured that this was
also a “time of hope,” as the peaceful
democratic transition of power in Nigeria
showed.
Reminding Governors that, over the past
few weeks, UN Member States agreed on a
new financing for development plan and on
the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development, he pointed out that the latter
would be adopted be formally adopted by
world leaders in New York in September,
while governments will meet in Paris in
December to agree on a new far-reaching
climate change agreement.
“Together, these three processes provide an
opportunity to put the world on a
sustainable pathway fostering human
prosperity while protecting our planet,” the
Secretary-General continued.
In that regard, local governments have an
important role to play in the
implementation of the Sustainable
Development Goals, he added, emphasizing
five essential ways for Nigeria to “build on
your advances and sustain that
momentum.”
First, the universal framework will have to
be tailored to national circumstances to live
up to its promise to be an agenda “of the
people, for the people, and by the people”
that leaves no one behind. Sub-national
and local governments, he assured, will
play a major role in the national tailoring
process and in ensuring that this process is
participatory and inclusive.
“Second, we need to work together to
establish a revitalized global partnership for
development. Each of you is crucial for
engaging local civil society organizations
and the private sector in the
implementation of the goals at local level.”
Third, the UN top official explained, sub-
national and local governments can help
ensure that the limited available funds are
targeted at the most vulnerable and
marginalized who are often hard to reach,
in particular ensuring health, education,
empowerment and equality for women and
girls.
“That leads to my fourth point –
institutionalizing gender mainstreaming
across all government ministries and bodies
responsible for implementing agenda 2030,
with effective means of implementation and
capacities for monitoring progress.”
Fifth, he noted, Governors can support the
follow-up and review process by “feeding
inputs” directly into the review and by
helping to ensure the quality of data by
investing in institutions and using big data
to inform better planning and decision
making.
“Accurate data will also allow us to better
respond to new and unforeseen
challenges,” Mr. Ban observed.
“This is a crucial moment for Nigeria. You
face many serious challenges, but you have
also taken a hugely important step to move
forward in a way that can respond to the
aspirations of the country’s people. I am
eager to hear your views on how you think
you can best achieve this universal and
ambitious agenda,” he concluded.
I repeat, the political leaders of the rest of
the South East of Nigeria needs to make
commitments to begin the transparent and
accountable process of dialogues of the
governed and the governors with a view to
governing in line with the modalities that
would be targeted at HUMAN capital
development just as the Abia state
governor has tried to so with his PROUDLY
MADE IN ABA BRAND PROMOTION
GLOBALLY. All the South East States must
carry along the leaders of the CIVIL
RIGHTS COMMUNITIES IN THE REGION so
the interests of the people including the
obligations to protect their lives and
properties from violence must be
mainstreamed in the process of
governance. Without the promotion and
protection of the welfare and wellbeing of
the People of the South East of Nigeria then
the essence and primary duties of civil
leaders in all the political offices are
defeated. We will very shortly learn from a
new book on HUMAN RIGHTS AND GLOBAL
POLITICS in which a chapter dealt with the
primacy of the people in the governance
process of the SOVEREIGNTY.
That chapter of the book states as
follows:“We may distinguish two main kinds
of institution, representative and functional.
On the one hand, there are institutions
which represent particular groups and
interests in both practical and ideological
senses; on the other, there are those which
have functions in organizing general
ideological diffusion, apparently on behalf
of society as a whole. Examples of the
former are the traditional representative
institutions of civil society, churches,
parties, trade unions, the press and the
intelligentsia. Major functional institutions
include schools and universities, television
and radio”.
It affirmed further: “Both sets of
institutions have had strongly national
forms. Indeed, both can be seen as the
‘organic civil institutions, to use Gramsci’s
language, not so much of modern,
capitalist society in general, as he believed,
as of the modern nation-state.
Representative institutions have
represented society above all in the context
of the nation-state- I discussed above how
their most universalistic pretensions
conceal adaptations to the nation-state and
its ideology. Functional institutions have
educated and informed within and on
behalf of nation-states, performing
essential roles in national socialisation and
mobilisation, although often proclaiming
universal notions of knowledge and truth”.
Conclusively, these experts asserts: “In
both kinds of institution, there have been
tensions between the Universalistic values
and norms around which their ideologies
revolve, and the national context in which
they have been inserted”. (Human Rights in
Global Politics Edited by Tim Dunne and
Nicholas J. Wheeler).”
All said, what is undeniable and consistent
is that the society cannot possibly
experience peace, growth in the economic,
political, environmental thematic areas, if
the wellbeing, welfare and security of the
citizens do not become the NORMATIVE
CULTURE OF GOVERNANCE MODELS. South
East of Nigeria is in need of leaders that will
think and work to advance the public good
and general interests of the people and not
those who seek only their own political
means of wealth acquisition. Those who
have ears should hear. The clock is ticking
fast and we are sitting precariously on top
of the barrel of the gun and sleeping on top
of the gathered gun powder amidst
agitations by the marginalised, the
alienated, the abandoned and the wretched
of the South East of Nigeria. THIS IS
dangerous as these moral, HUMAN and
emotional explosives may implode with
devastating consequences.
*EMMANUEL ONWUBIKO is head of the
HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION
OF NIGERIA (HURIWA) and blogs@www.
theingerianinsidernews.com,
www.huriwanigeria.com.